Kirchhoff's Transformation
Table of Contents
Description
Many non-linear conduction problems, where the properties are a function of temperature can be addressed with a variable transformation. In the foregoing demonstration, consider the conduction equation
where the conductivity is a function of temperature. The equation can be linearized with the following variable substitution.
such that the reference conductivity k0 = k(T0). By taking the spatial and temporal derivative of both sides of this transformation with LeibnizRule, we obtain the following expressions.
and
Using these in the original governing equations results in
Usually the temperature dependence of α = k / ρc is small compared to the dependence of either the product ρc or quantity k. Therefore, the resulting equation can be solved for θ using standard linear techniques.
Once θ is known, then the transformation can be used to convert back to temperature.
Example
In silicon, the thermal conductivity between room temperature and 800K is a strong function of temperature approximated as
(Image(kvt.png) failed - File not found)
where
, and
. In a SOI-MOSFET heat is generated in a localized spot underneath the drain. The transient conduction away from this region can be modeled as one-dimensional giving
with boundary conditions − k∂T / ∂x | x = 0 = q'' and T(x→∞) = Tr, and initial condition T(t = 0) = Tr.
Using the Kirchhoff transformation given above, the governing equation becomes
and boundary conditions are − kr∂θ / ∂x | x = 0 = q'', θ(x→∞) = 0, and θ(t = 0) = 0.
The solution for the foregoing system, which can be obtained from any undergraduate heat transfer text, can be written as
Assuming our temperature dependent expression for conductivity, we can evaluate the integral in the transformation as
Now the temperature can be written as
The results below are shown for
, and
after
. The reference is the temperature distribution assuming constant conductivity at the reference value.
(Image(tvx.png) failed - File not found)
Acknowledgment
This development follows that of Arpaci (Conduction Heat Transfer, Addison Wesley, 1966), p. 129.