Support

Trouble Report

For immediate assistance browse through our support center. You can find answers to many questions in just a few minutes.

If still experiencing problems, send us a report.

required
Why the math question?

Online Simulation

And More

Top Tags

  1. radiation
  2. heat transfer
  3. carbon nanotubes
  4. microscale heat conduction
  5. molecular dynamics
  6. phonons
  7. heat conduction
  8. note
  9. boiling
  10. thermal radiation
  11. radiativeproperties
  12. index of refraction
  13. thermal transport
  14. nanotechnology
  15. optical thickness
  16. acetylene
  17. equation
  18. boiling flow regime
  19. thin films
  20. transport
  21. flow visualization
  22. infrared
  23. microchannels
  24. thermal circuit
  25. two-phase flow

Other

Purdue ME 606: Beyond the Gray Approximation and Radiative Heat Flux (Lecture 10)

Beyond the Gray Approximation

Spectral enclosure energy balance:

\frac{{q''_{\pi i} }}{{\varepsilon _i }} - \sum\limits_{j = 1}^i {\left[ {\frac{1}{{\varepsilon _{\lambda i} }} - 1} \right]} \hat q_{\lambda j} F_{ij}  = E_{b\lambda i}  - \sum\limits_{j = 1}^N {E_{b\lambda j} F_{ij} }


Generally, divide spectrum into M bands (Δλs)

N surfaces , M bands M \cdot Nequations

Integral coupling equation

{q''}_i  = \int_0^\infty  {{q''}_{\lambda i} } d\lambda  = \sum\limits_{m = 1}^M {{q''}_{\lambda i}^{(m)} } \Delta \lambda _m

E_{bi}  = \int_0^\infty  {E_{b\lambda i} } d\lambda  = \sum\limits_{m = 1}^M {E_{b\lambda i}^{(m)} } \Delta \lambda _m

Simplest Approximation: Semi Gray

Two wavelength bands—most useful when source and wall temperature differ greatly.

M=2; # of equation =2N;

Unknowns: 4N

q''andT for each band on each surface


Going further, we could have more refinement of the spectrum

Non-gray directional radiation exchange

Need to use I(\lambda ,\theta ,\bar r)

I_\lambda  (\theta ,\bar r) = \varepsilon _\lambda  (\theta )I_{b\lambda }  + \int {\rho _{bd\lambda } (} \theta _i ,\theta ,\bar r)I_\lambda  (\theta _i )\cos \theta _i d\omega _i

Now, we must discreteize both \bar r and θ

Let’s each has N increments

MN2equations (M is # of spectral segments)

Computer Graphics

Typically:

N=5,000 – 50,000 +

M=3 – 8 (ex. RGB, CMYK)

ρbdtreated fairly simply

Often supplemented by a specular reflectivity

ρs = ρsi)

Radiative Heat Flux

\bar q_\eta ^{''}  \cdot {\hat n} = \int_{4\pi } {I_\eta  ({\hat s}} ){\hat s} \cdot \hat nd\omega

\bar q'' = \int_0^\infty  {\bar q_\eta ^{''} } d\eta  = \int_0^\infty  {\int_{4\pi } {I_\eta  ({\hat s}} )\hat sd\omega d\eta }

Divergence:

\nabla  \cdot \bar q_\eta ^{''}  = \int_{4\pi } {\frac{{dI_\eta  }}{{ds}}d\omega }

General Equation of Radiative Transfer

Derivation: Iη = net rate of radiant transfer

In direction of S per area per solid angle \left[ {\frac{W}{{m^2 Sr}}} \right]

\eta  = \frac{{2\pi }}{\lambda } is the wave number

Absorption/ Scattering

dIη = kηIηds + σηIηds = βηIηds


kη: linear, monochromatic absorption coefficient \left[ {m^{ - 1} } \right]

ση: linear, monochromatic scattering coefficient \left[ {m^{ - 1} } \right]

Outscattering

Total attenuation

βηkη + ση \left[ {m^{ - 1} } \right]Extinction coefficient

For all incident beams in a volume:

\int_{4\pi } {k_\eta  I_\eta  d\omega _i }  + \int_{4\pi } {\sigma _\eta  I_\eta  d\omega _i }  = \int {\beta _\eta  I_\eta  } d\omega _i

If Iη is isotropic then:

\int_{4\pi } {k_\eta  d\omega _i }  + \int_{4\pi } {\sigma _\eta  d\omega _i }  = \int {\beta _\eta  } d\omega _i


In general, we do not expect


βη,kηη to depend on direction

Last modified on 04 Nov, 2008