Support

Trouble Report

For immediate assistance browse through our support center. You can find answers to many questions in just a few minutes.

If still experiencing problems, send us a report.

required
Why the math question?

Online Simulation

And More

Top Tags

  1. radiation
  2. phonons
  3. conduction heat transfer
  4. heat transfer
  5. thermal conductivity
  6. microscale heat conduction
  7. molecular dynamics
  8. carbon nanotubes
  9. metal hydride
  10. heat conduction
  11. porous media
  12. particle morphology
  13. nanotechnology
  14. particle size distribution
  15. dispersion
  16. thermal radiation
  17. wiki
  18. micro- and nano-scale transport phenomena
  19. groups
  20. thermal transport
  21. thermoelectric properties
  22. eigenvalue
  23. boiling
  24. index of refraction
  25. Convection

Other

Purdue ME 606: Beyond the Gray Approximation and Radiative Heat Flux (Lecture 10)

Beyond the Gray Approximation

Spectral enclosure energy balance:

\frac{{q''_{\pi i} }}{{\varepsilon _i }} - \sum\limits_{j = 1}^i {\left[ {\frac{1}{{\varepsilon _{\lambda i} }} - 1} \right]} \hat q_{\lambda j} F_{ij}  = E_{b\lambda i}  - \sum\limits_{j = 1}^N {E_{b\lambda j} F_{ij} }


Generally, divide spectrum into M bands (Δλs)

N surfaces , M bands M \cdot Nequations

Integral coupling equation

{q''}_i  = \int_0^\infty  {{q''}_{\lambda i} } d\lambda  = \sum\limits_{m = 1}^M {{q''}_{\lambda i}^{(m)} } \Delta \lambda _m

E_{bi}  = \int_0^\infty  {E_{b\lambda i} } d\lambda  = \sum\limits_{m = 1}^M {E_{b\lambda i}^{(m)} } \Delta \lambda _m

Simplest Approximation: Semi Gray

Two wavelength bands—most useful when source and wall temperature differ greatly.

(Image(semi-gray.jpg) failed - File not found)

M=2; # of equation =2N;

Unknowns: 4N

q''andT for each band on each surface


Going further, we could have more refinement of the spectrum

(Image(non-gray.jpg) failed - File not found)

Non-gray directional radiation exchange

Need to use I(\lambda ,\theta ,\bar r)

I_\lambda  (\theta ,\bar r) = \varepsilon _\lambda  (\theta )I_{b\lambda }  + \int {\rho _{bd\lambda } (} \theta _i ,\theta ,\bar r)I_\lambda  (\theta _i )\cos \theta _i d\omega _i

Now, we must discreteize both \bar r and θ

Let’s each has N increments

MN2equations (M is # of spectral segments)

Computer Graphics

Typically:

N=5,000 – 50,000 +

M=3 – 8 (ex. RGB, CMYK)

ρbdtreated fairly simply

Often supplemented by a specular reflectivity

ρs = ρsi)

Radiative Heat Flux

(Image(ray-plane_03.jpg) failed - File not found)

\bar q_\eta ^{''}  \cdot {\hat n} = \int_{4\pi } {I_\eta  ({\hat s}} ){\hat s} \cdot \hat nd\omega

\bar q'' = \int_0^\infty  {\bar q_\eta ^{''} } d\eta  = \int_0^\infty  {\int_{4\pi } {I_\eta  ({\hat s}} )\hat sd\omega d\eta }

Divergence:

\nabla  \cdot \bar q_\eta ^{''}  = \int_{4\pi } {\frac{{dI_\eta  }}{{ds}}d\omega }

General Equation of Radiative Transfer

(Image(ray-cone_09.jpg) failed - File not found)

Derivation: Iη = net rate of radiant transfer

In direction of S per area per solid angle \left[ {\frac{W}{{m^2 Sr}}} \right]

\eta  = \frac{{2\pi }}{\lambda } is the wave number

Absorption/ Scattering

dIη = kηIηds + σηIηds = βηIηds


kη: linear, monochromatic absorption coefficient \left[ {m^{ - 1} } \right]

ση: linear, monochromatic scattering coefficient \left[ {m^{ - 1} } \right]

Outscattering

(Image(outscattering.jpg) failed - File not found)

Total attenuation

βηkη + ση \left[ {m^{ - 1} } \right]Extinction coefficient

For all incident beams in a volume:

\int_{4\pi } {k_\eta  I_\eta  d\omega _i }  + \int_{4\pi } {\sigma _\eta  I_\eta  d\omega _i }  = \int {\beta _\eta  I_\eta  } d\omega _i

If Iη is isotropic then:

\int_{4\pi } {k_\eta  d\omega _i }  + \int_{4\pi } {\sigma _\eta  d\omega _i }  = \int {\beta _\eta  } d\omega _i


In general, we do not expect


βη,kηη to depend on direction

Last modified on 04 Nov, 2008